Saya difahamkan bahawa En Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal telah mengeluarkan kenyataan dalam satu sidang media di Hotel Prince, 11 pagi tadi, menarik balik kenyataannya yang dibuat p[ada 1 julai 2008.

Alasan yang diberikan untk menarik balik akuan bersumpah asal yang dibuat, yang dirakamkan oleh diri saya sendiri, ialah “dipaksa membuat pengesahan melalui ...]]> 4 July 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Saya difahamkan bahawa En Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal telah mengeluarkan kenyataan dalam satu sidang media di Hotel Prince, 11 pagi tadi, menarik balik kenyataannya yang dibuat p[ada 1 julai 2008.

Alasan yang diberikan untk menarik balik akuan bersumpah asal yang dibuat, yang dirakamkan oleh diri saya sendiri, ialah “dipaksa membuat pengesahan melalui ugutan”.

Tiada sebarang butiran berhubung paksaan dan ugutan telah diketengahkan. En Bala dilaporkan tidak menjawab soalan yang dikemukakan pagi tadi di dalam sidang medianya siapa yang mengugutnya.

Untuk rekod, Saya mengesahkan bahawa perakuan bersumpah yang dilakukanoleh En Bala pada 1 Julai 2008 yang disiarkannya semalam dibuat secara sukarela dihadapan kehadiran saya dan pesuruhjaya sumpah, Dr T. Yokheswarem.

Saya menemui En Bala untk pertama kalinya, dengan kehadiran beberapa individu lain kira-kira dua bulan lalu dimana beliau telah meminta bantuan saya untuk menyediakan satu dokumen rasmi merangkumi beberapa bukti yang telah tidak diketengehakan dalam perbicaraan Altantuya yang sedang berlangsung.

Saya meulakan proses berkenaan dua minggu selepas itu. Saya telah menemuinya beberap kali dimana apa yang dinyatakan oleh En Bala pada saya telah saya rakamkan secara bertulis.

Saya tidak mempunyai alasan untuk meragui apa yang En bala nyatakan pada saya selain daripada ia adalah yang benar dan peranan saya adalah untuk mendengar apa yang beliau katakan dan menulisnya menjadi satu perakuan bersumpah dalam format yang sistematik dan komprehensif.

Kenyataan bersumpah itu kemudian dilakukan pengesahan dihadapan pesuruhjaya sumpah yang dinyataan di atas yang bertanyakan pada En Bala samada beliau faham isi kandungannya dan samada ia adalah pengakuan bersumpah beliau sendiri..

Selepas En Bala mengesahkannya, beliau telah diminta untuk menandatangani tiga salinan dan pesurujaya kemudiannya mengesahkannya. En bala telah diminta menunjukkan kad pengenalannya kepada pesuruhjaya sumpah dan kemudiannya menadtangani buku rekod.

Sehubungan itu, saya amat terkejut dengan tindakan En Bala yang dalam masa 24 jam telah mendapatkan perkhidmata peguam lain dan membuat satu lagi perakuan bersumpah menyatakan perakuan bersumpah yang pertama adalah tidak benar dan beliau dipaksa membuatnya.

Oleh kerana saya amat mengenali sifat En Bala, selepas menghabiskan masa berjam-jam merakamkan kenyataannya, saya meragui beliau menandatangani perakuan bersumaph yang kedua  dengan rela dan saya yakin beliau diugut berbuat demikian samada melalui ancaman ataupun janji kerana saya tidak dapat memikirkan alasan lain.

Pesuruhjaya sumpah yang mengesahkan perakuan bersumpah yang pertama bersedia untuk megesahkan apa yang telah saya katakan di atas berkaitan perakuan bersumpah telah dibuat oleh En Bala dengan secara sukarela.

Lagipun, En Bala mengenali pesuruhjaya sumpah berkenaan sebaik saja En Bala nampak beliau kerana mereka berasal daripada perkampungan yang sama di Slim River, yang sesuatu tidak saya ketahui.

Americk Singh Sidhu

Semalam, di bilik sidang media ini, dan dengan kehadiran kebanyakan daripada anda sekali lagi, En Bala Subramaniam telah mengeluarkan perakuan bersumpah yang menampilkan bukti terhadap pelakuan jenayah menyembunyikan bahan bukti serta pembohongan terhadap kes bunuh Altantuya.

Dihadapan ramai hadirin, En Bala mempertahankan kenyataan bersumpahnya, tetapi menjawab kepada satu soalan, beliau mengakui ...]]> 4 Julai 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Semalam, di bilik sidang media ini, dan dengan kehadiran kebanyakan daripada anda sekali lagi, En Bala Subramaniam telah mengeluarkan perakuan bersumpah yang menampilkan bukti terhadap pelakuan jenayah menyembunyikan bahan bukti serta pembohongan terhadap kes bunuh Altantuya.

Dihadapan ramai hadirin, En Bala mempertahankan kenyataan bersumpahnya, tetapi menjawab kepada satu soalan, beliau mengakui bimbangkan keselamatan peribadinya berikuta kuasa dan kedudukan individu yang beliau kaitkan.

Saya berasa bimbang malam tadi, dalam apa carapun dan seperti yang En Bala risaukan, satu lagi jenayah telah berlaku.

Satu jenayah yang menyebabkan En Bala, pagi tadi telah menarik balik akuan bersumpah yang telah dibuatnya pada 1 Julai lalu yang telah beliau dedahkan kepada umum.

Kami juga menyedari bahawa setiap baris tertentu dalam kenyataan baru yang telah dibuat telah dibuang khususnya ayat yang mengaitkan nama Timbalan Perdana Menteri.

Episod sedih ini, mengesahkan seperti apa yang dinyatakan oleh Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim semalam - bahawa wujud corak yang konsisten memanipulasi sistem keadilan di negara kita.

Malam tadi telah menyaksikan satu lagi perbuatan memanipulasikan bukti yang berkaitan dengan perbicaraan pembunuhan yang amat penting.

Kami sangat berpuashati bahawa kenyataan bersumpah pertama En Bala dibuat secara sukarela dengan niat bahawa kebenaran tidak boleh lagi disembunyikan daripada rakyat - bahawa amat penting bagi kita untuk mengetahui mengenai rahsia yang disimpannya sejak Oktober/November 2006 lalu.

Keyakinan kita terhadap kenyataan bersumpah yang asal berdasarkan maklumat yang diberikan kepada kita oleh En. Americk singh Sidhu serta berdasakan permerhatian kami terhadap En Bala sendiri.

Untuk rekod, kenyataan bersumpahnya telah pertama kali ditunjukkan kepada kami pada hari Rabu, 2 Julai, iaitu sehari selepas akuan sumpah itu dibuat bersama peguamnya pada selasa, 1 hb Julai.

Kini, persoalan utma yang timbul adalah - mana satukah akuan bersumpah yang dibuat mewakili kebenaran? Inilah persoalan yang mesti diambiltindakan terlebih dahulu oleh Suruhanjaya DiRaja yang kami gesa ditubuhkan sertamerta.

Hakikat bahawa penarikan balik itu dibuat begitu pantas dan dimana keadaan yang menyaksikan En Bala berkata beliau diugut untuk membuat akuan bersumpah tetapi tidak menamakan pihak yang membuat ugutan menunjukkan keadaan itu sendiri.

Siapa yang memiliki motif untuk menghantar En Bala membuat dakwaan yang merosakkan terhadap, polis, kamar pendakwa raya dan Datuk Seri Najib dengan idea bahawa beliau kemudian akan menarik balik kenyataannya serta merta? Begitu sukar untuk meneka siapa.

Bagaimanapun, siapa yang mempunyai motif untuk mengugut En Bala menarik balik serta merta kenyataannya malam tadi? Sudah tentu, dari kandungan akuan sumpahnya yang pertama, beberapa orang mempunyai kepentingan.

Kami mendesak Suruhanjaya Diraja ditubuhkan untk menyiasat persoalan utama yang dinyatakan di atas - mana satukah perakuan bersumpah yangmewakili kebenaran?

Isu ini mesti dipersoalkan dalam perbicaraan Altantuya oleh kedua-dua pihak supaya kebenaran akan dapat diwujudkan. Lagi pun, pihak pendakwa sekarang perlu bertanggngjawab untuk menyiasat kembali kesemua dakwaan En Bala.

Naib Presiden Parti Keadilan Rakyat
Sivarasa Rasiah

Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia (AMK) menyelar tindakan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak yang berterusan mengulangi pembohongan beliau kepada rakyat mengenai hubung kait beliau dengan mendiang Altantuya Sharibuu dan juga keterlibatan beliau sebagai dalang di dalam fitnah terbaru melibatkan Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Setelah pendedahan menggemparkan yang dibuat oleh penyiasat persendirian ...]]> KENYATAAN MEDIA
4 Julai 2008

Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia (AMK) menyelar tindakan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak yang berterusan mengulangi pembohongan beliau kepada rakyat mengenai hubung kait beliau dengan mendiang Altantuya Sharibuu dan juga keterlibatan beliau sebagai dalang di dalam fitnah terbaru melibatkan Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Setelah pendedahan menggemparkan yang dibuat oleh penyiasat persendirian yang pernah diupah oleh Abdul Razak Baginda, P. Balasubramaniam mengenai hubungan Najib dan Altantuya dan ditambah pula dengan penarikbalikan Akuan Bersumpah yang dikatakan berlaku pada hari ini di dalam masa kurang daripada 24 jam telah membangkitkan lebih banyak tandatanya daripada jawapan mengenai kesahihan penafian Najib Razak bahawa beliau tidak kenal Altantuya.

Keengganan isteri Najib pula, Rosmah Mansor untuk mengheret Raja Petra Kamaruddin ke mahkamah di atas Akuan Bersumpah yang dibuat Raja Petra mengenai keterlibatan Rosmah di dalam pembunuhan mendiang Altantuya juga mewujudkan spekulasi yang sangat serius, apakah benar yang beliau sememangnya terlibat.

Pengakuan Najib bahawa beliau juga turut bertemu Saiful Bukhari Azlan beberapa hari sebelum laporan polis dibuat oleh Saiful juga sekaligus membenarkan dakwaan AMK sebelum ini bahawa konspirasi untuk memalitkan imej dan kareer politik Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim turut melibatkan Najib dan kuncu-kuncunya.

Justeru, siri-siri penipuan ini adalah satu petanda negatif bagi imej seorang Timbalan Perdana Menteri yang kelihatan seringkali cuba melarikan diri daripada persoalan-persoalan yang melibatkan integriti dan maruah negara.

Berdasarkan kepada perkembangan terbaru ini, AMK ingin menggesa agar Najib meletakkan jawatan kerana integriti dan kewibawaan beliau dipertikaikan dan pastinya akan memberikan implikasi negatif kepada imej Negara di mata dunia dan pelabur-pelabur asing.

AMK juga mencabar supaya Perdana Menteri, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi untuk mengambil tindakan sewajarnya dengan menggantung tugas Najib sebagai Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Pertahanan. agar beliau boleh disiasat dan didakwa jika terbukti beliau bersalah.

AMK mendesak supaya tindakan yang disarankan diambil pada kadar segera agar imej negara tidak terus terpalit dengan pelbagai masalah kerana kepimpinan yang lemah dan bankrap moral.

SHAMSUL ISKANDAR MOHD AKIN
Ketua
Angkatan Muda KeADILan Malaysia

Penyelaras Gabungan Protes Dr Hatta Ramli mengesahkan penukaran lokasi perhimpunan itu. Menurut Ketua Angkatan Muda KeADILan (AMK) Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin, perubahan tempat itu diputuskan dalam mesyuarat Pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat ...]]> Perhimpunan Aman Protes Sejuta Rakyat yang dijadualkan pada 6 Julai ini di Padang Timur Petaling Jaya ditukar ke Stadium MBPJ Kelana Jaya.

Penyelaras Gabungan Protes Dr Hatta Ramli mengesahkan penukaran lokasi perhimpunan itu. Menurut Ketua Angkatan Muda KeADILan (AMK) Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin, perubahan tempat itu diputuskan dalam mesyuarat Pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat di kediaman Ketua Umum KeADILan Anwar Ibrahim di Bukit Segambut Damansara malam semalam.

Parti-parti Pakatan Rakyat dijangka menggemblengkan sejuta rakyat sebagai tanda bantahan kepada kenaikan harga minyak dan inflasi mutakhir ini.

Stadium Kelana Jaya, terletak berhampiran Tasik Kelana Jaya dan pasaraya Giant, boleh memuatkan 50,000 tempat duduk dan terletak bersebelahan Lebuhraya Damansara-Puchong. Padangnya juga boleh memuatkuan jumlah hadirin yang sama.

Hadirin boleh menaiki sistem Transit Aliran Ringan (LRT) ke Stesen Kelana Jaya atau Taman Bahagia, atau menggunakan perkhidmatan bas Rapid KL iaitu: U84 Pasar Seni-Kelana Jaya, U86 Bandar Utama-Sri Damansara, U88 Pasar Seni-Kota Damansara dan U89 Stesen LRT Kelana Jaya-Kota Damansara, T623 Stesen LRT Kelana Jaya-Taman Mayang Mas, T624 Kelana Jaya Sunway-Subang Parade dan T625 Kelana Jaya-Stadium MBPJ.

Kenyataan Anwar dan Tiga Setiausaha Agong

ADAKAN PERHIMPUNAN RAKYAT DI STADIUM KELANA JAYA
 
Pakatan Rakyat berpandangan rakyat perlu diberikan ruang untuk mengeluarkan pendapat dan berkumpul bagi melahirkan rasa tidak puas hati terhadap keputusan kerajaan menaikkan harga minyak dengan begitu drastik tanpa alasan kukuh.
 
Melihat kepada perkembangan suasana politik semasa Pakatan Rakyat menasihatkan agar Perhimpunan Rakyat yang dijadualkan pada Ahad 6 Julai ini dibuat di Stadium Kelana Jaya. Kami dimaklumkan pihak Protes juga bersetuju dengan cadangan kami ini.
 
Kami menyeru rakyat yang mendokong perjuangan menegakkan kerajaan yang lebih adil dan telus agar menyertai perhimpunan aman pada hari Ahad ini. Rakyat juga dinasihatkan agar tidak terpengaruh dengan provokasi pihak luar.
 
 
 
Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim
Ketua Umum PKR
 
 
YAB Lim Guan Eng
Setiausaha Agung DAP
 
 
YB Dato’ Kamarudin Jaffar
Setiusaha Agung PAS
 
 
Datuk Salehudin Hashim
Setiausaha Agung PKR

Perakuan Berumpah penyiasat persendirian Balasubramian Perumal itu membutirkan penemuan beliau berhubung hubungan intin antara Najib Razak itu dan wanita Mongolia yang dibunuh dengan kejam oleh dua pengiring ...]]> Ketua Penerangan KeADILan Tian Chua menyeru pihak berkuasa untuk meneliti dan mengambil serius Perakuan Bersumpah yang mendedahkan hubungan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Najib Razak dan Altantuya Shaariibuu.

Perakuan Berumpah penyiasat persendirian Balasubramian Perumal itu membutirkan penemuan beliau berhubung hubungan intin antara Najib Razak itu dan wanita Mongolia yang dibunuh dengan kejam oleh dua pengiring peribadi Timbalan Perdana Menteri itu.

“Meskipun pihak Najib Razak menafikan pendedahan Perakuan Bersumpah itu, namun bukti penting ini tidak harus dikesampingkan oleh pihak berkuasa. Terdapatnya bukti dan maklumat penting dalam perakuan ini, dan pihak polis harus siasat penemuan ini dengan adil dan telus,” tegas Tian Chua ketika dihubungi Suara Keadilan.

Balasubramaniam adalah bekas anggota polis dan menjalankan perkhidmatan penyiasat persendirian hinggalah beliau diupah oleh penasihat kepada Najib Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda, untuk memantau pergerakan Altantuya.

Dalam satu sidang media tergempar hari ini di Ibu Pejabat KeADILan Kota Damansara, Balasubramanian mendedahkan Najib pernah bersetubuh dengan mangsa, bahkan Altantuya tidak mempunyai masalah diliwat oleh Timbalan Presiden Umno itu.

Dalam satu perkembangan yang lain, Tian Chua menasihatkan ahli-ahli parti dan orang ramai untuk bertenang dan tidak mempedulikan desas-desus Ketua Umum KeADILan Anwar Ibrahim telah ditangkap polis.

“Ini tidak benar sama-sekali. Saya minta semua ahli dan penyokong untuk bertenang dan tidak percaya kepada desas-desus ini. Maklumat sahih akan disampaikan melalui saluran rasmi parti dari jawatankuasa yang telah dilantik memantau dan menguruskan situasi ini.”

Desakan itu dibuat Khalid Ibrahim (KeADILan-Bandar Tun Razak) dalam ucapan perbahasan beliau dalam usul kajian separuh penggal (RMK-9).

Menurut Khalid lagi, kerajaan juga sebelum ini tidak ...]]> Parlimen, 3 Julai (SK) – Pakatan Rakyat mendesak kerajaan melaksanakan projek pembangunan di bawah Rancangan Malaysia Ke-9 (RMK-9) secara adil khususnya di setiap negeri termasuklah negeri yang kini diperintah Pakatan Rakyat.

Desakan itu dibuat Khalid Ibrahim (KeADILan-Bandar Tun Razak) dalam ucapan perbahasan beliau dalam usul kajian separuh penggal (RMK-9).

Menurut Khalid lagi, kerajaan juga sebelum ini tidak pernah membentangkan peruntukkan secara lebih terperinci bagi setiap negeri dalam pelaksanaan rancangan lima tahun tersebut.

Beliau berharap pelaksanaan RMK-9 ini akan lebih mengambil kira kepentingan rakyat secara keseluruhannya di samping meminta kerajaan untuk lebih terbuka mendedahkan peruntukan bagi setiap negeri.

Dalam sidang media di Ibu Pejabat KeADILan pagi ini, Balasubramaniam telah memberikan beberapa butiran yang menunjukan hubungan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Najib Razak bersama dengan Altantuya.

Beliau turut mendedahkan Najib Razak telah memperkenalkan Altantuya kepada Penganalisa Politik, ...]]> KUALA LUMPUR, 3 Julai (SK) - Penyiasat persendirian, Balasubramaniam Perumal hari ini mendedahkan Timbalan PM telah melakukan hubungan seks dengan Altantuya.

Dalam sidang media di Ibu Pejabat KeADILan pagi ini, Balasubramaniam telah memberikan beberapa butiran yang menunjukan hubungan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Najib Razak bersama dengan Altantuya.

Beliau turut mendedahkan Najib Razak telah memperkenalkan Altantuya kepada Penganalisa Politik, Razak Baginda di satu pameran berlian di Singapura.

Namun apa yang menggemparkan adalah: Najib pernah menyetubuhi mangsa. Menurut Balasubramaniam, siasatan beliau mengesahkan berlakunya hubungan seksual diantara Timbalan Perdana Menteri itu dan mangsa.

Tambah Balasubramaniam lagi, mangsa tiada masalah untuk diliwat oleh Timbalan Presiden Umno itu.

lagi berita menyusul..

Press Statement - for immediate release —

3 July 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Today we witness another episode of a consistent pattern of abuse of power and manipulation of the criminal justice system.

Recently one of the witnesses in the Altantuya trial approached us with detailed information of events connected to her disappearance and murder. The information was shocking.

Mr. P. Balasubramaniam, who was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda as a private investigator was advised to seek legal counsel and document his story independently.

Today he is releasing a statutory declaration dated 1st July 2008 to the public detailing the story that he has to tell about what actually happened and what was told to him by key personalities in this saga including Abdul Razak Baginda and Altantuya herself.

These revelations speak for themselves. They reveal, amongst others, the following allegations:

1. Mr. Balasubramaniam was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda to deal with alleged harassment by Altantuya in relation to debts owed to her (Paragraph 5 and 6).
2. Altantuya was promised a commission of USD 500,000 for assisting in a submarine deal in Paris (Paragraph 22, Paragraph 25.5 and Paragraph 28.2 and 28.3 ).
3. Altantuya was introduced to Razak Baginda by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore ( Paragraph 25.5 and Paragraph 28.1).
4. Altantuya, Datuk Seri Najib and Razak Baginda had all been seen together at a dinner in Paris (Paragraph 28.2).
5. After the disappearance of Altantuya, a commotion took place in front of Razak Baginda’s house several days after 20 December 2006 where girl friends of Altantuya and one Mr.Ang (Altantuya’s own private investigator) arrived searching for Altantuya. Balasubramaniam had to call the police. A patrol car arrived shortly. Shortly thereafter an investigating officer from Dang Wangi Police Station who was handling the missing persons report lodged by one of Altantuya’s girl friends arrived. Balasubramaniam then informed Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. Razak then called one DSP Musa Safri who called him back informing him that Musa would be calling him on his handphone and that he was to pass the phone to the inspector from Dang Wangi Police station. Balasubramaniam then received the call from Musa Safri and duly passed the phone to the inspector. After the conversation of 3 – 4 minutes, the inspector told the girls to disperse and to see him the next day (Paragraphs 34 – 38). We believe DSP Musa Safri was aide-de-camp to Datuk Seri Najib at the material time.
6. Balasubramaniam was interrogated at Bukit Aman for seven consecutive days and his statement recorded at the end of November 2008. He says that he told the police all that he knew including everything Razak Baginda and Altantuya had told him about their relationships with Najib. These details were omitted from the statement he was asked to sign (Paragraph 49).
7. During the trial of Sirul, Azilah and Razak Baginda at at the Shah Alam High Court, the prosecutor did not ask him any questions in respect of the relationship Altantuya had with Datuk Seri Najib or of the phone call that he had received form DSP Musa Safri (Paragraph 50).
8. When Razak Baginda was arrested, Balasubramaniam was told by him that he had sent an SMS messsage to Najib the evening before (Paragraph 51). Razak also informed Balasubramaniam that he had received an SMS from Najib and showed it to him; the message read “I am seeing IGP at 11 A.M. today …. matter will be solved … be cool”.

Mr. Balasubramaniam’s evidence also mentions the extent of the relationship between Altantuya and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. We are not interested in the personal nature of the relationship. That is entirely his own business and hers.

However the allegations revealed by him raise key questions of public interest:

a) Suppression of evidence by the police investigating officers and those responsible for prosecuting this case. Such suppression could only have happened with the full knowledge of top public officials such as the IGP and the AG.
b) The question is also raised as to whether such suppression of evidence was the reason behind the last minute switch in DPP’s handling the case – where the head of the Criminal Division of the AG’s Chambers, Datuk Yusuf Zainal Abiden was completely sidelined from the case leading him and the senior DPP originally slotted for the case Sallehudin Saidin to put in papers for early retirement some months later.
c) Questions can be raised now with regard to the sudden switching of the judge fixed to hear the case which took place in March 2007 – why was this really done?
d) Did Datuk Seri Najib lie when he said that he had never met Altantuya before?
e) Did Datuk Seri Najib lie when he said that he was not involved in any commission deals for the purchases of the Scorpene submarines”

Mr.Balasubramaniam’s evidence vindicate what we have been saying all along; there has been no proper investigation of the murder of Altantuya and the investigation and proceedings in court seem to following a pre-arranged script for a pre-arranged outcome.

This has serious implications for the administration of justice in the country where the integrity and credibility of our key institutions such as the police, the AG’s chambers and the judiciary are already severely tarnished.

Today’s revelations further confirm a clear and consistent pattern of manipulation of the criminal justice system that we have witnessed in this country since 1998.

The allegations revealed here warrant a full Royal Commission of Inquiry.

ANWAR IBRAHIM

Pengakuan Bersumpah;

STATUTORY DECLARATION

I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal (NRIC NO: 600928-08-6235) a Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at No. 32, Jalan Pelangi 1, Taman Pelangi, Rawang, Selangor do solemly and sincerely declare as follows :-

1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having jointed as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance Corporal and finally resigned from the Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.

2. I have been working as a free lance Private Investigator since I left the Police Force.

3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.

4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.

5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the 05-10-2006 as he had apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.

6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.

7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.

8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.

9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.

10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in Mongolia.

11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.

12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.

13. On the 09.10.2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.

14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.

15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.

16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.

17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash ran out.

18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.

19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.

20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t so I called the police who arrived in 2 patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her away to the Brickfields police station.

21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.

22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.

23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.

24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.

25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-

25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.

25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.

25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.

25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.

25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.

26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual. I saw a yellow proton perdana taxi pass by with 3 ladies inside, one of whom was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then left.

27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “To delay her until my man comes”.

28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-

28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.

28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.

28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.

28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.

28.6 That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.

28.7 That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red proton aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.

30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue proton saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The drivers window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.

31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.

32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.

33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.

34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girl friends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.

35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.

36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.

37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the Inspector from Dang Wangi Police Station.

38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 – 4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.

39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.

40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.

41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.

42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.

43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.

44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.

45. In mid November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for Criminal intimidation.

46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On the third day I was released on police bail.

47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.

48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the 19.10.2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.

49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. everyday for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.

50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.

51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.

52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- “ I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.

53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.

54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-

54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

54.3 Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.

54.4 Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.

54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.

55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.

SUBCRIBED and solemnly )

declared by the abovenamed )

Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal ]

this day of 2008 )

Before me,

………………………………….

Commissioner for Oath

Kuala Lumpur

Perkara berkenaan dijelaskan oleh Naib Presiden KeADILan yang juga Ahli Parlimen Gombak, Azmin Ali.

Ketika ditemui di Parlimen beliu menyatakan bahawa Ahli Parlimen berkenaan telah menghubungi beliau melalui telefon dan ternyata komitmen mereka untuk ...]]> PARLIMEN, 2 Julai (SK)- Pendirian empat Ahli Parlimen Barisan Nasional (BN) yang dikatakan akan menyertai Pakatan Rakyat masih diteruskan walau apa jua keadaan.

Perkara berkenaan dijelaskan oleh Naib Presiden KeADILan yang juga Ahli Parlimen Gombak, Azmin Ali.

Ketika ditemui di Parlimen beliu menyatakan bahawa Ahli Parlimen berkenaan telah menghubungi beliau melalui telefon dan ternyata komitmen mereka untuk sertai Pakatan Rakyat masih kuat.

Sebelum itu, Timbalan Menteri Pembangunan Usahawan, Saifuddin Abdullah berkata ketaatan beliau kepada Barisan Nasional masih tinggi dan tidak akan sertai mana-mana pakatan.

Mengulas perkara sedemikian, Azmin berkata sebelum ini, Parti Maju Sabah (SAPP) telah menyatakan untuk setia di belakang Perdana Menteri, namun SAPP juga yang mengumumkan akan melakukan usul tidak percaya kepada Abdullah Badawi.

Azmin menyatakan kemungkinan ada Ahli Parlimen tidak mahu mengumumkan untuk sertai Pakatan Rakyat pada waktu ini berikutan beberapa insiden.

Dalam ucapan Anwar Ibrahim, beliau mengatakan mempunyai bukti kukuh bahawa Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan ada kaitanya bersana Najib Tun Razak dan isteri ...]]> SHAH ALAM, 2 Julai (SK) - Stadium Melawati Shah Alam malam tadi begema laungan Reformasi dan jeritan Lawan Tetap Lawan oleh 20,000 penyokong Pakatan Rayat yang menunjukan sokongan penuh terhadap Ketua Umum, Anwar Ibrahim.

Dalam ucapan Anwar Ibrahim, beliau mengatakan mempunyai bukti kukuh bahawa Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan ada kaitanya bersana Najib Tun Razak dan isteri beliau.

Selain itu, Anwar sekali lagi menyatakan bahawa Saiful bukanlah Pembantu Khas kepada beliau seperti didakwa sebaliknya hanyalah seorang penolong kepada Pembantu dan Staff di pejabatnya.